|
|
|
|
Network
Unifications in Paros |
The water supply network of Paros is highly fragmented, due
to the past administrational structures governing the water
supply. As a result, there are a number of separate water
supply networks that are each supplied by local resources,
some in the most heavily populated parts of the island
facing water shortages during the summer peak. Other regions
are more water-rich and could contribute towards alleviating
the problems where these are faced through the
implementation of network connections and unifications.
A combination of four feasible interventions has been
identified, in terms of water availability and existing
deficits, and technical feasibility (Map 1):
-
A connection between the water networks of Alyki and
Kampos.
-
A connection between the water networks of Dryos and
Marpissa.
-
A connection between the water networks of the town of
Naoussa and its suburbs.
-
Finally, a connection between Kostos and Naoussa.
Map 1. Proposed network unifications |
|
|
Option details and results
|
The first three of the proposed connections are considered
necessary, since the areas to be supplied face permanent water
shortage problems. Between scenarios it is the appropriate
connection years that will vary and that will be assessed. The cost
of the new connections, estimated according to their length and
pipeline diameter, is presented in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Network unification costs
Connection |
Construction Cost (€) |
Agairia – Kampos |
9,000 |
Naoussa
– Naoussa Suburbs |
44,000 |
Dryos –
Marpissa |
18,000 |
Kostos
- Naoussa |
400,000 |
Total |
471,000 |
Under normal (average) water availability conditions,
the first three connections are implemented in 2005. Since the settlement of
Naoussa does not face deficiency problems before the year 2021, the connection
should be made much later, in 2028. Figure 1 presents the total volume of water
transferred by each connection under the BAU + Normal scenario.
Figure 1. Volume of water transferred from each connection (BAU + Normal
scenario)
In dry years transferred volumes
normally increase during the summer months, with the provision that local water
needs are always satisfied before any transfer is made. Monthly distribution
differs for average or wet years. In some areas (e.g. Paroikia) already existing
infrastructure is adequate to meet water needs up to the peak month of August.
After that however, local resources are depleted, and additional water transfers
are required for meeting the demand.
Figure 2. Monthly volumes of water transferred for the
three scenarios (year 2009)
Top
|
Effectiveness
|
Under average availability conditions, the unification of the island’s
fragmented networks can lead to an increase in domestic demand coverage.
Overall, when water availability is increased due to increased precipitation,
there is a significant effect on the domestic demand coverage, due entirely to a
better allocation of the available resources (Figures 3 and 4).
The effect becomes smaller as demand increases, since larger water quantities
are required for satisfying local needs before making water transfers through
the new connections, and since no additional water supply sources have been
introduced in the system.
Figure 3. Percent demand coverage
effectiveness of Network Unifications to Domestic use
Figure 4. Percent Improvement of deficit in Domestic use
with respect to the reference scenarios
Network unifications have a positive effect only in domestic demand coverage,
which is higher under a high frequency of wet years (LD + HW scenario).
Irrigation demand coverage (Figures 5
and 6) is overall decreased over time
due to the increasing demand for domestic use. A similar pattern of
effectiveness improvement as with the domestic use is observed where the overall
water availability is significantly increased due to increased precipitation.
Figure
5. Percent demand coverage
effectiveness of Network Unifications to Irrigation use
Top
|
Direct and Environmental Costs
|
Overall the option is not very
expensive, since the unifications proposed are between neighbouring municipal
departments and construction costs are low (Table 1). Additional cost is
incurred from the augmentation of water distributed through the network but in
any scenario this increase does not exceed 5% of the respective reference
scenario direct cost, expressed in present value terms (Figure 7). The
present value increase of the option under the LD+HW scenario is much lower,
since the most expensive connection between Kostos and Naoussa is not required.
An additional remark is related to the most expensive connection between the
municipal departments of Kostos and Naoussa. This connection is used only after
2028, when the installed desalination capacity cannot meet the demand, and is
required only under normal or dry conditions. Additionally, the unification
creates problems in the provision of water supply to the Paroikia municipal
department. Therefore, the connection should - if realised - be combined with
the construction of new boreholes or other supply enhancement measures in order
to stabilise the supply delivered to the other regions from the boreholes of Kostos area.
Figure 7. Total direct cost difference of the Network
Unifications option under the three scenarios (Present Value – Million €)
The total environmental costs for
network unifications do not vary significantly between the intervention scenario
and the reference conditions for each availability/demand scenario (Figure 8);
this is due to the fact that the environmental cost is calculated at the level
of the resource and on the basis of total abstraction levels. The option does
not affect groundwater abstraction levels; all available water resources are
considered exploited and the increase of domestic abstractions is followed by a
decrease of irrigation abstractions. Therefore, the total volume of water
abstracted from each aquifer remains at the same level as with the reference
scenario, and total environmental costs are more or less constant.
Figure 8.
Total environmental cost difference of the Network Unifications option under the
three scenarios (Present Value – Million €)
Top
|
|
|