|
Topics |
|
Scenario
Analysis - Objectives and Methodology |
|
An example application: Paros island, Greece |
|
|
Step 1: Scenario Formulation |
|
|
Step 2: The identification of options |
|
|
Step 3: Analysis of options |
|
|
Step 4: Overall Evaluation |
|
Announcements |
|
The ARID Cluster
hosted the Joint Workshop with the EU
Water Directors in Palermo, Sicily, on 8-9 October 2004 |
|
Links |
|
International Workshop on Water and Disasters,
13-14/12/2004, University of Western Ontario |
|
Third International Conference on Water Resources
Management, 11-13/04/2005,
Algarve, Portugal |
|
International
Conference on Water Economics, Statistics
and Finance,
8-10/07/2005, Rethymno, Crete |
|
Varia |
|
New at EPA website: "Water Quality Trading Assessment
Handbook" |
|
New publication
by IWA: "Phosphorus in Environmental
Technology" |
Contact
Information
For further information on the
WaterStrategyMan
Project and its Participants,
please contact Professor D. Assimacopoulos
assim@chemeng.ntua.gr
Tel.: +30-210-7723218 Fax: +30-210-7723155 | |
|
|
|
Editorial |
The current issue of the WaterStrategyMan
Newsletter presents the framework of the work undertaken in the Project
Case
Study regions under Task 8.3 of the Project,
“Generation of
coherent water management scenarios”. The aim of the task
was
to “build water management scenarios to evaluate alternative
allocation options of water resources in the Case Studies”.
The scenarios should be based on “specific supply
interventions or demand side actions”, aiming to assess
“their
effect on the current and future matching of water demand”.
This assessment is based on a “comparison with the
reference case” using “user-defined
criteria” set by “the water users, regulators and decision
makers”.
The aim of the work undertaken in Task
8.3 was to:
-
Determine what options can
potentially be used in the Case Study region through the
literature, stakeholder consultations and/or own
experience,
-
Apply the selected options separately on the
region, and determine a range of potential application
for each option, and
-
Evaluate each of the option
applications (with respect to the pre-defined criteria).
The outcomes of the scenario analysis
are currently used for the formulation of appropriate Water
Management Strategies for the Case Study Regions in the next
stage of the Project (Figure
1).
Figure 1. The WSM final stage outputs
Task 8.3 was undertaken separately by
all the Case Study Partners of the Project under the
coordination of the NTUA. Each Case Study Partner undertook
the analysis of their respective Case Study Regions.
The current issue presents the
methodology of Scenario development, as well as an
illustration of this methodology through the findings in the
Case Study of Paros Island, Greece. The following
issue (January – March 2005) will be dedicated to presenting
the developed Integrated Water Management Strategies. |
|
The
WaterStrategyMan
Project (Developing Strategies for Regulating and Managing
Water Resources and Demand in Water Deficient Regions / WSM),
is supported by the European Commission under the
Fifth
Framework Programme, under the Key Action
"Sustainable Management and Quality of Water". |
|
|
|
|
Introduction to Coherent Water Management Scenarios:
Regional Context and Formulation of Responses
|
|
The major goal of the WSM Project is the development
of appropriate alternative integrated water resources management
strategies for each of the paradigms identified in the 1st Phase of the
Project. These will take into account the principles of Integrated Water
Resources Management:
In Water Resources Management, the word “Paradigm” describes a school of
thought on prioritizing Policy Options for the Management of Water
Resources. Each paradigm refers to the:
-
Geographical entities and their grouping regarding physical and human
criteria,
-
Driving forces like population or economic activity trends,
- Physical parameters of the available water resources (state, uses,
effects),
- Planning and measures regarding the available resources.
|
The formulation of a Paradigm is a difficult and complicated procedure,
as it reflects the conflicts between the established scientific and
technological approach and the political and social opinions and
demands. In order to define the range of and collect concepts that
describe structural and human (administration, financial
management, participatory procedures) parameters of a water system, one must understand the
technical, social, financial, cultural and environmental issues of the
Paradigm.
The understanding of the existing policy options and actions that have
been followed in order to manage water resources, and their theoretical
background, lead to identification of some basic and distinct Paradigms
of Water Resources Management for each region. Therefore, the Dominant
Paradigm for each region is the existing, traditional way of “how things
have always been done”, combined with the conditions that have led to
that approach.
The DPSIR approach, which is often used for the assessment of water
management systems using indicators describing the existing Drivers,
Pressures, State, Impacts and Responses, lends itself to a new
interpretation in the description of Paradigm formulation (Figure 2).
The drivers and pressures and their impact of water stress on the system
are defined in terms of a Typology (Table 1), whereas the Paradigm
corresponds to the dominant responses used to mitigate water stress.
|
|
|
Figure 2. Paradigm development in the DPSIR context
|
|
The process of eco-adaptation means that the regional Paradigms are not
static, as they both influence and are influenced by the regional
characteristics in a continuous cycle. The responses employed to modify
the water system are subject to the judgment of the local society; the
most successful of these will be used again, and combined with any “new”
methods that have been shown to be effective under similar
circumstances. |
This new combination of responses constitutes an “Emerging Paradigm”
that may in turn become dominant after it has been proven effective.
The integrated water resources management strategies under development
fall under the scope of determining the Emerging Paradigm for the six
regions of Case Study Analysis, described below. |
|
Case Studies Overview
|
Paros Island in the Cyclades complex, Greece. The main water stress
issue is the peak in demand during the summer months, due to the high
tourist influx onto the island. The existing infrastructure capacity is
stretched during that period and is often insufficient to cover demand
at peak times, leading to temporary shortages that in return are
damaging to tourism.
-
Typology: Predominantly
tourist (Type II), insular.
-
Dominant Paradigm: Since the
water demand started to grow
significantly in the 1980s, the
residents of Paros have attempted to
cover the water deficit through the
construction of private and public
drills, interception walls and a
small (1,450 m3/day)
desalination plant. However these
have not been the subject of a
systematic effort, and as such the
policies followed have led to a
number of problems in terms of
hindering economic development and
exerting pressure to the
environment. The dominant Paradigm
on the island shows a strong
tendency towards small-scale
structural supply enhancement
solutions.
The Limassol area, Cyprus. The effects of the competition for water
resources between tourism and agriculture, the two major sources of
income of the island, are being analysed, and the potential for a
compromising water management solution that will be beneficial to both
sectors needs to be determined. The region is one of the main tourist
destinations in Cyprus, while at the same time its agricultural
production accounts for more than 50% of the fruit trees, 50% of the
vegetable and 60% of the table grapes production of the country.
-
Typology: Predominantly
tourist (Type II), regional.
-
Dominant Paradigm: The
current strategy used for ensuring
adequate water supply for all uses,
responding to the current conditions
of water deficit, is based on a
combination of a number of policy
options, which fall short however in
achieving the goal of meeting
demand. The Dominant Paradigm in the
region is the combination of
large-scale infrastructure, smaller
structural interventions and reuse
for supply enhancement.
Belice Basin, Italy. The major source of water stress is the peak in
demand during the summer, due to irrigation demands in the region, and
new interventions are needed in order to satisfy the local irrigation
demands.
-
Typology: Predominantly
agricultural (Type III).
-
Dominant Paradigm: The
formation of the Arancio Lake on the
Carboj River in 1952 served
irrigation purposes for the nearby
territories, and the increased water
availability contributed to a change
in agricultural practices from crops
requiring little irrigation to more
irrigation dependent ones. The
subsequent creation of the Garcia
dam on the Belice Sinistro River
provided further supply for
irrigation and domestic demand. The
Dominant Paradigm in the region is
focused on the construction of
large-scale supply enhancement
infrastructure.
|
Tel-Aviv region, Israel. There are conflicts arising between the provision
of water for urban water supply and for agriculture irrigation in a
country where water is a very scarce and valuable resource. The Tel Aviv
region is the largest in Israel with two million people, 30% of the
total population, and 5% of the total cultivated land in the country.
The water economy in Tel-Aviv is characterized by relatively high
domestic and industrial consumption, and relatively low agricultural
consumption.
-
Typology: Tel-Aviv -
Predominantly urban (Type I).
-
Dominant Paradigm: The water
used for the region comes from
desalinated sea water, groundwater
abstractions and water reuse. About
two thirds of it is supplied to
Tel-Aviv via the national water
system operator, and the remainder
is provided by private producers
from the coastal aquifer. The
Dominant Paradigm in the region
relies heavily on large-scale water
production technologies.
The Island of Tenerife in the
Canary Islands, Spain. The
year-round high water demand in the
island is caused by a tourist influx
much larger than the local
population, demanding large
infrastructure that nevertheless
needs to be paid for by the locals.
In addition, the combined effect of
increased tourist activity and
maintenance of high water-demanding
crops in the last decades is highly
alarming, and the overexploitation
of the groundwater resources is
obvious.
-
Typology: Predominantly
tourist (Type II), insular.
-
Dominant
Paradigm: The water
shortages in Tenerife have
traditionally been addressed through
the increasing drilling of
underground water galleries for
abstraction. The dominant paradigm
for the island relies mostly on
supply enhancement through medium to
large-scale infrastructure
development.
Ribeiras do Algarve, Portugal.
Despite the relative abundance of
water resources, salinity of the
underground aquifers is a rapidly
intensifying problem due to the
over-abstraction of water for use in
golf courses and other
tourism-related uses. In the last
decades the basin has suffered deep
changes in its demography mostly due
to the development of tourist
activities. The pressure on water
resources created by seasonal
population is very strong, leading
to water shortage problems during
the summer months, and is compacted
by the significant agricultural
demand. The increasing abstraction
has led to salinisation of the
underground aquifers in the area,
making finding an alternative means
of supply both necessary and urgent.
-
Typology: Predominantly
tourist (Type II), regional.
-
Dominant Paradigm: The
water demand of the region has
traditionally been covered with
abstracted groundwater; this however
has changed in recent years, and
water demand is now mostly covered
through surface water from
reservoirs. The current dominant
paradigm in Ribeiras do Algarve
involves mainly the use of
large-scale supply enhancement
infrastructure.
|
|
Table 1. Summary presentation of identified types
Typology |
Description of underlying conditions |
Regions |
I (Predominantly Urban) |
-
Regions including metropolitan/large urban centres.
-
Main economic activities largely belong in the tertiary
sector, although secondary sector activities are also present.
-
Water deficiency is either:
-
permanent, due to insufficiency of resources for the
existing population, or
-
seasonal due to meteorological/ hydrological
fluctuations.
|
Tel-Aviv |
II (Predominantly Tourist {insular / regional}) |
-
Regions or islands dependent on tourism, with small to
medium sized urban centres and large seasonal population
fluctuation.
-
Dependence on agriculture as well but the main source of
income is tourist activities.
-
Seasonal water deficiency as a result of the population
fluctuations due to the tourist industry’s peak in the
summer months.
-
Price elasticity is variable, depending on the local
conditions.
|
Paros, Tenerife (insular)
/
Limassol, Algarve (regional) |
III (Predominantly Agricultural) |
-
Regions dependent on agriculture, with small to medium sized
urban centres and limited population fluctuation.
-
Dependence on secondary and tertiary sector activities is
often limited compared to agriculture, which is the main
source of income.
-
Usually seasonal water deficiency as a result of increased
crop requirements of water in the summer time.
-
Price elasticity is variable, depending on the local
conditions.
|
Belice Basin |
|
|
|
|
|